(Oct 31, 2024 08:33 AM)latencyx Wrote: I've been using this method for about 2 months, I recently came to explore for sale and if it is detected there are thousands of ways to get around it and if it is detected I will bring a quick update,It's just a matter of trying and seeing
Good luck. All I am saying is no one in their right mind is gonna pay 70 for it. I saw that banner you made. I wouldn't even pay 5 for it. But good luck. There's gonna be someone willing to buy anything. Also isn't this on your github?
(Oct 31, 2024 08:35 AM)Biggy_Asian Wrote: Good luck. All I am saying is no one in their right mind is gonna pay 70 for it. I saw that banner you made. I wouldn't even pay 5 for it. But good luck. There's gonna be someone willing to buy anything. Also isn't this on your github?
the service is not available on github, the only thing I made available was a source that has similarities with mine about Uac Bypass. If you come here to bring non-beneficial criticism there is no need, I fulfill the objective of the service being sold correctly and I believe it is a fair price for what is offered, thank you for the comments.
(Oct 31, 2024 08:46 AM)latencyx Wrote: the service is not available on github, the only thing I made available was a source that has similarities with mine about Uac Bypass. If you come here to bring non-beneficial criticism there is no need, I fulfill the objective of the service being sold correctly and I believe it is a fair price for what is offered, thank you for the comments.
If you do not want such criticism do not post such services otherwise expect such. If not me it would be someone else. I get you "think" (I am mearly quoting) its a fair price however I and likely ALOT of other people will almost not see it that way.
Also you say it has similarities however that leads me to have reason to believe it is mostly just that source with some slight changes or non at all.
(Oct 31, 2024 08:52 AM)Biggy_Asian Wrote: If you do not want such criticism do not post such services otherwise expect such. If not me it would be someone else. I get you "think" (I am mearly quoting) its a fair price however I and likely ALOT of other people will almost not see it that way.
Also you say it has similarities however that leads me to have reason to believe it is mostly just that source with some slight changes or non at all.
Yes friend, I understand your point of view, I am updating the service daily so that it meets users' expectations and that I can charge this amount, however, it has only been 4 days since the start of public development and I am meeting the objectives, I believe There are many other sellers who sell much more expensive products and don't even want to maintain consistency in their updates, etc., I appreciate your comments as it is necessary and believe me I am working to have an efficient product
(Oct 30, 2024 03:40 AM)latencyx Wrote: I'm thinking about it, but I'm going to improve security and the user panel a little more, I'm going to give access to some members who have a good reputation, I believe there are few providers of the same service as mine, and those that exist charge an absurd amount for just one file, while I sell unlimited access to a number of files New Update!
I'm still working on the website hosting along with small aspects of our service. Our website is now online but still under construction! I created an infographic for sales. Since I don’t have access to the HF market, I’ll just share updates of my work here. Curious users can see the new changes and improvements, as well as give ideas for the project. ^^ Of course, if you're a recognized user in the community, feel free to request a test; I'd be happy to send you a test key! [2 Keys free]
[*] Website update for different devices
[*] Domain update
[*] The project has been named Empty Builder (I thought it was interesting xD)
Remember, this project is in its early stages, so any contributions will be greatly appreciated!
To the user who comes from HF out of curiosity, mention I give a $10 discount (Temporary)
For those users who have little knowledge in this area or are interested, contact me, I am willing to help HF members to build a reputation! Everyone is welcome.✌ Demonstration:
Teacher, I have a question for you. I see that the powshell directive in your reg uses base64.
Why doesn't your antivirus software report virus warnings?
I am working on a complex method and it has been successful, but it seems that false positives and blocking seem to be difficult to solve, especially when writing ps1 under Run, it will be blocked.
I used multiple pieces of encrypted malware code and stored them elsewhere in Run for easy recall, assembly, and execution.
Such as: A0-A800 hexadecimal or base64
Call using powshell
Works great but is too complex
Nov 1, 2024 01:47 PM (This post was last modified: Nov 1, 2024 01:48 PM by latencyx.)
(Nov 1, 2024 01:41 PM)woo097878781 Wrote: Teacher, I have a question for you. I see that the powshell directive in your reg uses base64.
Why doesn't your antivirus software report virus warnings?
I am working on a complex method and it has been successful, but it seems that false positives and blocking seem to be difficult to solve, especially when writing ps1 under Run, it will be blocked.
I used multiple pieces of encrypted malware code and stored them elsewhere in Run for easy recall, assembly, and execution.
Such as: A0-A800 hexadecimal or base64
Call using powshell
Works great but is too complex
Base64 itself is not the problem; try executing legitimate code through PowerShell, and you will see that there won't be issues. If you have problems with PowerShell, it's because something in your base64 raises suspicion with AMSI. Try to circumvent this by modifying the content of your base64. Feel free to send your code to me privately for me to check.
edit:
I will soon release a .LNK builder here that will also use BASE64 parameters, but it is not intended to bypass WD, it will be free so it may be interesting for studies, I recommend it
(Nov 1, 2024 01:47 PM)latencyx Wrote: Base64 itself is not the problem; try executing legitimate code through PowerShell, and you will see that there won't be issues. If you have problems with PowerShell, it's because something in your base64 raises suspicion with AMSI. Try to circumvent this by modifying the content of your base64. Feel free to send your code to me privately for me to check.
edit:
I will soon release a .LNK builder here that will also use BASE64 parameters, but it is not intended to bypass WD, it will be free so it may be interesting for studies, I recommend it
Teacher thank you
Your articles are very valuable
You inspire me a lot and I will continue to learn from you.
Nice to communicate with you
If you can share the .LNK builder, I will study it carefully.
(Nov 3, 2024 05:40 AM)mres Wrote: Great product. latencyx even helped me, setting up a RAT for me, and was patiently using his time to learn me a couple of things.
no detection on WD, no smartscreen so its does what it says it does.
(Oct 31, 2024 08:35 AM)Biggy_Asian Wrote: Good luck. All I am saying is no one in their right mind is gonna pay 70 for it. I saw that banner you made. I wouldn't even pay 5 for it. But good luck. There's gonna be someone willing to buy anything. Also isn't this on your github?
This is HackForums....there will be plenty of people that don't know anything beyond plug&play stuff buying this trying to play Hackermans so let the person open up his store and earn some money.
It's not like he's trying to scam people, in some sense he's selling "convenience" so people that buy this don't have to spend their time learning some basics to do it themselves.
We shall see how much demand there is for it.
(Nov 3, 2024 11:24 AM)Hreidmar Wrote: This is HackForums....there will be plenty of people that don't know anything beyond plug&play stuff buying this trying to play Hackermans so let the person open up his store and earn some money.
It's not like he's trying to scam people, in some sense he's selling "convenience" so people that buy this don't have to spend their time learning some basics to do it themselves.
We shall see how much demand there is for it.
I find it interesting that you make these comments for guys who sell a single .reg for $1000, and not for me who has this entire service for just $70 lol
(Nov 4, 2024 06:44 AM)latencyx Wrote: I find it interesting that you make these comments for guys who sell a single .reg for $1000, and not for me who has this entire service for just $70 lol
Not sure what kind of comments do you mean, maybe you're misunderstanding my reply to the other poster?