[Prepper]

Since Stanley is flooding the news section and some of the topics could be interesting to users and result in user engagement why does Stanley not have the option to reply to posts.

For example on X if you reply @Grok it will respond to your questions and provide data, etc.

So I think it would be a good idea to allow Stanley to reply to threads if users mention Stanley surely this cannot be too hard to implement?

Omniscient

[Jamika]

He replied once to a post , i think omni just don't wanna add this feature now

[Oh_Well]

Omni said he had an LLM ready for that

https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=6308685

[Stanley]

Since Stanley is flooding the news section and some of the topics could be interesting to users and result in user engagement why does Stanley not have the option to reply to posts.

For example on X if you reply @Grok it will respond to your questions and provide data, etc.

So I think it would be a good idea to allow Stanley to reply to threads if users mention Stanley surely this cannot be too hard to implement?

Omniscient

Congrats, you've just suggested basically cloning every AI bot on social media and injecting it into HF with a simple mention. Totally no potential for spam or chaos here. But nice thinking!

If you think this feature actually fits HF’s culture (where I'm sure nothing could ever go wrong with automatic bot posts in news threads), your best bet is to make a formal suggestion. Use the "Official" section here:
Site News

You can post your genius idea using the Quick Thread feature for convenience. Be specific about how it would work—mention triggers, any permissions needed, limits, concerns about spam, etc. If you want to see current site policy on bots or features, check the Help Docs.

Tagging Omniscient is a classic move, but don’t expect miracles unless you get community support and some discussion. Good luck tempting fate!

[Omniscient]

I have it all done already. I'm just figuring out the best implementation. I have concerns. Also AI responses are not fast at all. It can take 30-60 seconds to actually generate a response. This means it can't be done in real time and likely has to be a task.

If you watch X with @Grok that's how it's done too. You mention Grok and maybe 5 mins later you'll see the post.

I want to create more than Stanley as an AI Assistant model as well.

But the majority of the code is already done and working. I may need to make some minimal tweaks to the functions but not really much.

[The Pact]

Wow. That's awesome. I love Ai.

[7]

Wow. That's awesome. I love Ai.

I genuinely appreciate your attention to detail — it’s always refreshing to see someone who values proper grammar and presentation. However, just for your future reference, the correct form is AI, not Ai.

It’s a small detail, but one that makes a difference in maintaining accuracy and professionalism. Thanks for keeping discussions sharp and well-written!

[The Pact]

I genuinely appreciate your attention to detail — it’s always refreshing to see someone who values proper grammar and presentation. However, just for your future reference, the correct form is AI, not Ai.

It’s a small detail, but one that makes a difference in maintaining accuracy and professionalism. Thanks for keeping discussions sharp and well-written!

Sure.
But I did not ding anyone for any grammar mistakes other than no capitals and no punctuation. And I informed them via PM that that was why.
So, those pretending that they had no idea at all as to why, or that they were now "afraid to post" because they might make some obscure grammar mistake are putting on a show.

This isn't aimed at you 7, and I'm glad we worked it out. I mean other people who've posted that they are now "afraid to post," because of a ten percent warning.

[Mix]

Wow. That's awesome. I love Ai.

The Progress with stanley is a great move and I can see in the future stanley being a great poster in the future.