Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

Can the rich solve all the world's problem?

The way I look at it, if ever billionaire should forfeit 10% ,of their network and 5% of every millionaire, I feel majority of the world's problem. Will be eradicated such as hunger, illiteracy but the wealthy actually aren't obligated to this wh6 we still have this problems
Theoretically it sounds like it would solve a lot, but global problems usually aren’t just about money. Hunger and illiteracy often come from politics, corruption, poor infrastructure, and conflict.
are you rich?
Probably not since they can't even solve their own problems
[Image: oGzLpzM.gif]
They could, of course, but why would they? They were raised with different principles. Would you forfeit 10% if you were in that position?
It would only solve those issues if the money directly goes in the hands of those in needs.

I read about this and there have been many studies done as well. The best way to help someone in life solve their material problem (food, shelter, water, education, etc) is to give them money. Because they know best their problem and they know best whether they need food, vehicle or roof repair.

If every rich billionaire gives away a percentage of their money and it goes to every poor person in the world then yes it would solve a lot of issues.
It's bad for the economy.
Money can't solve worlds problems. Thats for sure.
(Apr 22, 2026 07:48 AM)Nick Elite Wrote:  Money can't solve worlds problems. Thats for sure.

It can. If certain economies get in perfection, world hunger can be solved!
If that happened within a few months they would give the money straight back anyway. Better putting the money toward education

"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime"
[Image: vibesignature.gif]
The Brotherhood Vibe  Legends
(Apr 22, 2026 08:01 AM)Mr. Richie Wrote:  It can. If certain economies get in perfection, world hunger can be solved!

Who says world in in hunger, back in the old stone age, it was hunt x eat - every 10 men group goes to the battle - they end up loosing two or atleast one to score the food, and sometimes starve until weeks before they find another prey in their turf, now its money that controls everything, even the hungriest person can go to the streets and ask for a few pennies to eat, and out of 10 atleast 2 will give them.
(Apr 22, 2026 08:02 AM)7 Wrote:  If that happened within a few months they would give the money straight back anyway. Better putting the money toward education

"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime"

Couldn’t agree more !
(Apr 22, 2026 10:23 AM)Edmond Dantes Wrote:  Couldn’t agree more !

"Teach a man to fish" don't work. They don't even have bank accounts, the economy needs to get in shape.
(Apr 23, 2026 12:09 AM)Mr. Richie Wrote:  "Teach a man to fish" don't work. They don't even have bank accounts, the economy needs to get in shape.

Oh yeah there is the solution, give a corporate company the money you don't have. Or what do mean? you need a bank account to eat fish?
Not seeing how it works in either scenario.
[Image: vibesignature.gif]
The Brotherhood Vibe  Legends
(Apr 23, 2026 02:13 AM)7 Wrote:  Oh yeah there is the solution, give a corporate company the money you don't have. Or what do mean? you need a bank account to eat fish?
Not seeing how it works in either scenario.

It's a milli.


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
by PurgatoryOct 21, 2024 10:45 AM 54 661 Oct 21, 2024 10:45 AM
Last Post: Blockonome
by SIM-5273098Nov 10, 2022 01:09 PM 0 78 Nov 10, 2022 01:09 PM
Last Post: SIM-5273098
by CapJul 6, 2021 06:15 AM 5 91 Jul 6, 2021 06:15 AM
Last Post: Yanix