[мεяcү]

So simply I saw a lots of threats of new crypters made by our members in wich some freaking n00bs downloaded the crypter and scanned the files on http://www.virustotal.com/ ... and then they got flamed coz they just made the crypter detected or fully detected. So I am gonna explain it to you all why NOT to scan with http://www.virustotal.com/

emm I am gonna make this quick and simply so you can understand it.

If you scan everything with virustotal, your lovely server or crypter will get detected in like 100/1 time faster than normaly scanned with novirusthanks.

If you scan everything with novirusthanks, your lovely server or crypter will stay FUD for a longer time.

So to all of you wich didn't know, put ur brain back in ur head and turn it on AND USE http://vscan.novirusthanks.org/ BTW make sure you have enabled "Do not disturbe"

THANKS

[poild]

It's more of like a, "No shit, Sherlock" message.. Yet people do it.

[-mothered-]

Nice guide, but to be honest and In my opinion, I don't trust any online virus scan engines.

Who knows what happens behind closed doors.

[GoldenPhe0nix]

Also you should check the 'do not distribute' checkbox before making a scan at novirusthankyou
Otherwise your file will be sent to antivirus labs for analysis and it would soon be Fully Detectable.

[GetScraped]

We all know this, Jesus Christ.

[мεяcү]

Nice guide, but to be honest and In my opinion, I don't trust any online virus scan engines.

Who knows what happens behind closed doors.

yea +1 on that mate

We all know this, Jesus Christ.

But there are still a lot people doing it, so no you all don't know -.-'

[Zoobiker]

This should be stickied😉

[мεяcү]

DELETE THIS MESSAGE PLEASE

[Diamond Supply Company]

pEdObEaR_ Knows what he's talking about, taught me EVERYTHING.

[:'D]

I think people scan the actual crypter with VT (rather than the stub). IMO, they should do this because there are more virus scanners on there.

[iBRSteven]

How did you determine 100/1?

[Sudo]

This is true. Novirusthanks is much better.

[мεяcү]

How did you determine 100/1?

I didn't but how should we put that in theyr heads? I mean bout the scanning at vt and detecting the crypters / servers

[hacc]

I think people scan the actual crypter with VT (rather than the stub). IMO, they should do this because there are more virus scanners on there.

I do think most people use VT for scanning programs that might be infected (which I do).

Its a better idea because the VT scanner is better, plus I like the fact that if it is infected, the asswipe who backdoored it won't have it UD for long.

[sporetime]

I do think most people use VT for scanning programs that might be infected (which I do).

Its a better idea because the VT scanner is better, plus I like the fact that if it is infected, the asswipe who backdoored it won't have it UD for long.

Agreed. I just use it to scan stuff to check if its infected.