[Dr. Plague]

Hi guy's! Dr. Plague here, I am kind of new to HF but I want to start out HQ! I will be doing crypter review's for almost every crypter on HF. Please stay tuned! Attention! - If your product is on here, please read message at bottom of thread! Thanks!🤝
Want your crypter reviewed? Please PM me, I will see what I can do!🙂

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Crypter #1 - CyberSeal - A .NET Crypter with .NET 2.0 Dependence's. Wanna purchase? Go here! - https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=4515065

Background Story!

I bought this crypter like 4 month's ago! It was FUD right when I downloaded it. The FUD lasts a long time and if it get's 1-2 detection's it's fixed imminently! Great support and come's from a great coder! It had the longest FUD time I have seen in a public crypter!

Pro's!

+Great support
+Long lasting FUD
+Always FUD
+Lot's of feature's

Con's!

-Gen detection's may be hard to get rid of
-They should remove assembly or put a FUD assembly in the update
-Maybe should include FUD icon's too!
-.NET 2.0 Dependent

Usual FUD Time - 10-25 day's, sometimes longer!

Overall Opinion And Rating - This is a great crypter by a respected member! Do I think you should by this crypter? Yes! Overall I rate it 8/10!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Static crypter will be going here as Byte crypter has been removed due to a request from owner.🙂

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Crypter #3 - Krazy crypter - A crypter with .NET 2.0 Dependencies. Wanna purchase? Go here! - Thread!

Background Story!

I purchased this crypter around 20 day's ago. I first opened it and I crypted and it had only 2 detection's. The next day it was 100% FUD! I really love the UI very clean and it's my favorite color! Blue! It also has a lot of feature's!

Pro's

+Very nice UI
+Re-fuded quickly
+Very fast and nice support
+Cheap price's for license's
+Lost's and lot's of feature's

Con's

-FUD time is not the best out there
-Not for the "Noob" type. This can be good, or bad
-Like the con above some feature's people may not know how to work
-Which they would add a lifetime license but some people don't. All opinion's are different!
-.NET 2.0 Dependent

Usual FUD Time without ESETNOD Counting! - 1-5 day's

Usual FUD Time ESETNOD Counting! - 1-2 day's!

Overall Opinion And Rating - Overall this crypter is very good. The not that long FUD time is solved by fast update's. The large amount of feature's should make up for that though! Again, I really like the UI! Do I think you should buy this? Yes! Overall I Rate it 7/10!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Crypter #4 - Cloud Crypter - A online based crypter with .NET 2.0 Dependencies. Wanna purchase? Go here! - Thread!

Background Story!

I purchased Cloud Crypter about 1 week or less ago! Soon as I got my license from the owner I imminently tested it out! I put in multiple icons pack's. Then I setup all the setting's etc. I crypted and hit scan. 0/41 ! I really like when crypters are FUD soon as I get on them!

Pro's!

+Always FUD
+Great support
+Lot's of feature's to choose from
+Very nice UI
+Long FUD time

Con's!

-Online crypter, I would rather just have a program for easier crypting!
-Website has a little of a delay when switching option's. Very hard to notice.
-.NET 2.0 Dependent

Usual FUD Time without ESETNOD Counting! - 1-7 day's

Usual FUD Time ESETNOD Counting! - 1-3 day's!

Overall Opinion And Rating - This is a very misunderstood crypter! Some people say it is not very good, it is very good believe me! I still hope a program will be made for easier crypting. Do I think you should buy this crypter? Yes! Overall I Rate It 9/10!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Crypter #5 - Praesidium - A .NET crypter that is .NET 2.0 Dependent. Wanna buy? Go here! - Thread!

Background Story!

I actually purchased this soon as it came out. My friend said to do some tests on it. The first time I bought it was completely FUD! It stayed FUD for only 2 day's though then got 1 detection which isn't that bad! At least is was FUD when I bought it!

Pro's!

+Usually FUD
+97% USG for longer FUD
+Great fast support
+Great coder


Con's!

-Not that many feature's
-Does not support Native file's only .NET
-The FUD time is not the best in the world but is still good
-.NET 2.0 Dependent

Usual FUD Time without ESETNOD Counting! - 1-5 day's

Usual FUD Time ESETNOD Counting! - 1-3 day's!

Overall Opinion And Rating - This crypter is good I have to say. Their is some room for growth as he recently launched it. I defiantly say their need's to be more feature's added in future to make this crypter 100%! Should you purchase this crypter? I say Yes and No, because of lack of feature's and it not support Native File's. If you like the feature's and you have a .NET file, then go ahead and buy it! Overall I Rate It 6/10!


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Message To All Owner's/Coder's If Your Product Is On Here! ~ If you want me to review your crypter again if you did update's please contact me via PM. Anway, I do not mean and "Hard feeling's" to any of you! You guy's all do great work, I am just doing this to suggest edit's etc! Please contact me before taking action etc. Thanks for everything again!🤝

Want to see runtime test's? Please tell me down below in the comment's! If we get enough people I will do them! Anyway, please go check out a awesome thread by meeting for runtime test's for now! - Thread!

Want to ask question's about crypter's? Go here! - Thread!

Want to learn how to crypt Luminosity Link ? Go here! - Thread!

[MrKebab]

We already have a thread like this :)

[Dr. Plague]

We already have a thread like this :)

Yes I know. I will be posting crypters not on that thread!🙂

[MrKebab]

Yes I know. I will be posting crypters not on that thread!🙂

Oh ok, make sure to do proper runtime tests, without that.... Review will be kinda useless.

Bitdefender
Eset
Avg
Avira
Avast
Norton
Kaspersky
MSE
++

[Dr. Plague]

Oh ok, make sure to do proper runtime tests, without that.... Review will be kinda useless.

Bitdefender
Eset
Avg
Avira
Avast
Norton
Kaspersky
MSE
++

Yeah, Soon as I add all the cryoters ill add that.:)

[Twixles]

Awesome, to be honest the runtime tests is pretty useless information to me. I want to know how it's FUD, how quickly it gets a reFUD and so on. Could you add your average FUD time? (I know there's a ton of variables for us to consider here, but it'll give us a small idea of how the crypter is)

[Dr. Plague]

Awesome, to be honest the runtime tests is pretty useless information to me. I want to know how it's FUD, how quickly it gets a reFUD and so on. Could you add your average FUD time? (I know there's a ton of variables for us to consider here, but it'll give us a small idea of how the crypter is)

Yes, I will add FUD time's! I will add how quickly it get's re-fuded too!🙂

[MrKebab]

Awesome, to be honest the runtime tests is pretty useless information to me. I want to know how it's FUD, how quickly it gets a reFUD and so on. Could you add your average FUD time? (I know there's a ton of variables for us to consider here, but it'll give us a small idea of how the crypter is)

This is what i don't understand.
Runtime tests usless?
Quick refud, important?

I strongly disagree.
If a crypter isnt runtime fud, it will be uploaded immediately when ever it hits an antivirus that you dont bypass.
Several antiviruses also share their samples with virustotal. Guess what happens then?
Unfud! yaaaaay?....

It's a bad sign when a crypter needs a refud every day.. even if the author refuds it straight away but if detections pop up within a day or two, well then its shit. Doesnt matter of author refuds it quickly, its still shit.
It means that its overused and saturated. Lots of skids using it and author has to work his ass off to keep it fud.
I would never in my life buy a crypter that needs to be refudded every day. Ok the owner might be handling the detections great and refudding it.. But it doesnt mean its good at all.. rather the opposite.

Without being runtime fud, the crypter is useless.
Literally it would be the same as spreading a 35/35 detected file as scantime means nothing at all if it isnt runtime.

[Mitlar]

Please add the following crypters to your thread
- CloudCrypter
- DataProtector
- Dragon Crypter

[Twixles]

This is what i don't understand.
Runtime tests usless?
Quick refud, important?

I strongly disagree.
If a crypter isnt runtime fud, it will be uploaded immediately when ever it hits an antivirus that you dont bypass.
Several antiviruses also share their samples with virustotal. Guess what happens then?
Unfud! yaaaaay?....

It's a bad sign when a crypter needs a refud every day.. even if the author refuds it straight away but if detections pop up within a day or two, well then its shit. Doesnt matter of author refuds it quickly, its still shit.
It means that its overused and saturated. Lots of skids using it and author has to work his ass off to keep it fud.
I would never in my life buy a crypter that needs to be refudded every day. Ok the owner might be handling the detections great and refudding it.. But it doesnt mean its good at all.. rather the opposite.

Without being runtime fud, the crypter is useless.
Literally it would be the same as spreading a 35/35 detected file as scantime means nothing at all if it isnt runtime.

You must be able to see how flawed those arguments are, that's just not how it works x.x

[Hopsin]

Will you be doing review only from paid ones or the free (active) ones too ? Just wondering. Have a nice day btw.

[RS7™]

Will you be doing review only from paid ones or the free (active) ones too ? Just wondering. Have a nice day btw.

There is no point in doing the free ones since you can download them yourself and test it out.

[Hopsin]

There is no point in doing the free ones since you can download them yourself and test it out.

Not really. Sure you can try it yourself but this thread is about "Reviews" So, what about writing reviews for some free crypters based on OPs opinion ? It wouldn't harm either.

[Dr. Plague]

Please add the following crypters to your thread
- CloudCrypter
- DataProtector
- Dragon Crypter

Ill be adding cloud and a bunch more tonight! I do not have dragon and data currently though. I will be buying soon!🙂

[MrKebab]

You must be able to see how flawed those arguments are, that's just not how it works x.x

I hope you're trolling right?
Then explain to me how it "works" :)