[Orgy]

Hey MessCollider, since you refused to clarify in that other thread, I thought I'd see if you wouldn't mind clarifying here.

At one point, you called Bitcoin Cash:

a fail

Since then, I've tried to get you to back up this claim. I found out that you consider a coin to be a fail if it has:

lack of replay protection and even basic ability to send transactions on the day of release

Though Bitcoin Cash had both of these. After you realized that those claims were wrong, you moved on to:

I'm thinking about the trustworthiness and quality of the 'developers' of cash and it's code, code which is hacked together with a much lower standard of QA, test and review compared to core. That's why they had technical issues, and that's why I'm calling it messy.

Now that you've shifted your qualifications for a coin to be

a fail

from your previous requirements to now this new slew of slander, can you please elaborate on how Bitcoin Cash, a coin with multiple client/node implementations, has "hacked-together code"? I understand that you probably meant Bitcoin ABC, which is only one of the single client/node implementations for Bitcoin Cash. If that's the case, can you please explain why you think Bitcoin ABC is hacked together, and which technical issues the "hacked together code" of ABC caused for Bitcoin Cash?

[SUI-3183372]

Hmm maybe MeshCollider.... HMMMM....

---

Maybe this is a chance for you to clearly state your position

[Ravioli]

yeah i saw this dude's replies on that thread and he seemed pretty ignorant tbh, let's see what he has to say.

[Orgy]

Isn't this the guy that did omnicoin, which failed btw?

Yes, but I'm not sure its fair to call that a failure. That was more of an HF experiment and it went well as far as experiments go. Of course you can't expect it to take off if it's solely marketed on HF, for HF.

[Vana]

I sent him a PM asking for a response on that thread - it was read and ignored.

[grady]

Yes, but I'm not sure its fair to call that a failure. That was more of an HF experiment and it went well as far as experiments go. Of course you can't expect it to take off if it's solely marketed on HF, for HF.

Ye, the "success" of OMC pretty much required wide adoption within HF, but there's really no market for its use.
It was just 100x better to use BTC at that point, instead of wasting time & money exchanging for OMC.

[Orgy]

I sent him a PM asking for a response on that thread - it was read and ignored.

He read my PMs a few times, but only responded by changing the -rep he left me.

Admittedly I have him on ignore -- I want him to reply publicly. You'd think a guy that brags about tiny (and questionable) commits to the bitcoin core repo would be totally excited to come back up his claims

You still on the Core side btw?

[Omniscient]

Why bother calling him out so publicly? Are you really that butthurt he called Bitcoin Cash a fraud? Does his opinion matter so much to you?

And I'm not sure we can call Bitcoin Cash a success yet either.

[Orgy]

Why bother calling him out so publicly?

Because he made his claims in public.

Are you really that butthurt he called Bitcoin Cash a fraud? Does his opinion matter so much to you?

If it weren't for the fact that he of all people should know better, I wouldn't care. But he's well known around here for the development of omnicoin and the HF API, so I hold him to a higher standard. Or at least I did. If he's going to make these sorts of claims, I certainly expect him to back them up or admit that he was just parroting shit and didn't actually have idea what he was saying.

And I'm not sure we can call Bitcoin Cash a success yet either.

We absolutely can.

[DevSquad]

https://hackforums.net/private.php?action=send seems to be a function!

[Orgy]

https://hackforums.net/private.php?action=send seems to be a function!

Try reading the thread:

https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...id55841192
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?ti...id55841209

[Vana]

And I'm not sure we can call Bitcoin Cash a success yet either.

Why would you call it anything but a success?

You still on the Core side btw?

I have holdings in both coins :)

[Orgy]

Why would you call it anything but a success?

ooooh thats smooth

[Zack Fair]

I don't see him responding, would be surprised. You called him out multiple times on his own thread, pushing him to reply and he just ignored it lol.

[Orgy]

I don't see him responding, would be surprised. You called him out multiple times on his own thread, pushing him to reply and he just ignored it lol.

yeah kind of pathetic someone like that cant back up their claims. i used to have quite the respect for him, too, because i thought he was someone who knew his shit. between the hf api and omnicoin i thought he was pretty competent. but now not even the nuts to come in and say "you know what guys i made some claims that i just heard somewhere else and didnt actually look into but i was wrong, my bad"

tbh if it was almost anyone else i probably wouldnt have made this thread. there's very few people here that i deem worthy of respect and he was one of them. i guess that's why it bothers me so much.

meh oh well. ima keep the thread bumped till omni gets pissed at me enough to close it or till messcollider gets in here.