There's a lot of papers on the subject, it all comes down to training and evaluation, and you also need datasets that you use for training and evaluation (but those should be separate). If you want to start off with something quick, use tensorflow: https://www.tensorflow.org/guide/extend/cc
Not really. It's more based on calculus, and other algebra with matrices of numeric values; biases and weights that are tweaked over test data, and utilized to calculate the probability of a result in a variety of ways that are tailored to certain topics (i.e. dynamic speech recognition vs linear classification tasks like image recognition).
(Dec 11, 2018 11:12 PM)0xDEAD10CC Wrote: Not really. It's more based on calculus, and other algebra with matrices of numeric values; biases and weights that are tweaked over test data, and utilized to calculate the probability of a result in a variety of ways that are tailored to certain topics (i.e. dynamic speech recognition vs linear classification tasks like image recognition).
(Dec 11, 2018 11:12 PM)0xDEAD10CC Wrote: Not really. It's more based on calculus, and other algebra with matrices of numeric values; biases and weights that are tweaked over test data, and utilized to calculate the probability of a result in a variety of ways that are tailored to certain topics (i.e. dynamic speech recognition vs linear classification tasks like image recognition).
(Dec 11, 2018 11:12 PM)0xDEAD10CC Wrote: Not really. It's more based on calculus, and other algebra with matrices of numeric values; biases and weights that are tweaked over test data, and utilized to calculate the probability of a result in a variety of ways that are tailored to certain topics (i.e. dynamic speech recognition vs linear classification tasks like image recognition).
Completeley agree but I think you missed the dudes joke. It's a common programming meme to say that AI is just a whole bunch of if statements.