[Winds]

My suggestion is fairly simple.

Anyone that has open deal disputes that aren’t resolved will have a “deal with caution” tag below his awards. This might reduce the amount of exit scammers and help new users avoid getting scammed.

[Dorrance]

This seems like a feature they have on a competing forum? I think this goes hand to hand with the b-rating system, there are neutral & negative ratings. Unless this includes the old legacy disputes database.

[Winds]

This seems like a feature they have on a competing forum?  I think this goes hand to hand with the b-rating system, there are neutral & negative ratings. Unless this includes the old legacy disputes database.

They have it most forums, it really doesn’t matter. The b rating system is nice but there could be someone with 100% positive b rating and 3 deal disputes that are open.

[James Burnham]

How much more spoonfeeding do people need? Isn't a red b-rating noticeable enough? I don't think users should be treated like toddlers, they will forget how to think.

[Nas]

Sorry but I don’t see this happening. Can easily be abused and not worth the trouble. Just look at the persons B rating before dealing as well as trust scan.

[Winds]

How much more spoonfeeding do people need? Isn't a red b-rating noticeable enough? I don't think users should be treated like toddlers, they will forget how to think.

Like I said, there could be someone with an open dispute and positive b rating. I had an open dispute and while I solved it ASAP, I still had 100% positive b rating. It has nothing to do with “spoonfeeding” either, it’ll just save a lot of people from getting scammed, even old users.

[Nas]

Like I said, there could be someone with an open dispute and positive b rating. I had an open dispute and while I solved it ASAP, I still had 100% positive b rating. It has nothing to do with “spoonfeeding” either, it’ll just save a lot of people from getting scammed, even old users.

In the trust scan I believe it tells you if they have any open disputes.

[Dorrance]

How much more spoonfeeding do people need? Isn't a red b-rating noticeable enough? I don't think users should be treated like toddlers, they will forget how to think.

I feel the same, I don't understand why people do deals without doing there research or using a dam Middleman. it's easy we have the trustscan, b-rating, legacy dispute database, current database, & search bar for dam community alerts. Some people are not patient nor have brains.

[Omniscient]

How much more spoonfeeding do people need? Isn't a red b-rating noticeable enough? I don't think users should be treated like toddlers, they will forget how to think.

Exactly.

We have all the material needed in Market Profile and Trust Scan. We don't need giant red flags all over the site saying "DEAL WITH CAUTION".

This suggestion pisses me off. Especially if it's because HF clone sites do it. They copy me, I don't copy them. Asshole!