This was super useful to see if a user is just on vaca ban or got banned for something else.
Ex. I was scammed by a member and he's banned now, wondering if he's just vaca'd or actually got banned. If he's just vaca banned i might as well leave the dispute up but otherwise there's not much of a point
Why would you not leave a dispute up, regardless of what happened to the user in question? That makes no sense.
Omniscient has made it clear he doesn't want to reintroduce the feature for members and even though I do share your opinion that it's interesting to see, members don't really need the feature as it gives no advantage other then to start more drama regarding a ban.
That being said, there's been some new policies around for a while now that has members getting warned and limited (functionality wise) instead of banned. So if a user is actually banned it's most likely a vacation ban, a ban pending closure, or a permanent ban. There are exceptions of course but those should be rare.
(Sep 23, 2019 12:33 PM)Vitani Wrote: Why would you not leave a dispute up, regardless of what happened to the user in question? That makes no sense.
Omniscient has made it clear he doesn't want to reintroduce the feature for members and even though I do share your opinion that it's interesting to see, members don't really need the feature as it gives no advantage other then to start more drama regarding a ban.
That being said, there's been some new policies around for a while now that has members getting warned and limited (functionality wise) instead of banned. So if a user is actually banned it's most likely a vacation ban, a ban pending closure, or a permanent ban. There are exceptions of course but those should be rare.
Gotcha, makes sense. Thanks for the info
Sep 23, 2019 12:51 PM
(This post was last modified: Sep 23, 2019 12:51 PM by Omniscient.)
Done.
You're the only member who made a reasonable argument for allowing it.
Allowing it for Vendors too. Some Vendors are still L33t.
(Sep 23, 2019 12:51 PM)Omniscient Wrote: Done.
You're the only member who made a reasonable argument for allowing it.
Allowing it for Vendors too. Some Vendors are still L33t.
clay davis you're a fucking G
thanks for that
(Sep 23, 2019 12:51 PM)Omniscient Wrote: Done.
You're the only member who made a reasonable argument for allowing it.
Allowing it for Vendors too. Some Vendors are still L33t.
Dang that was fast. 🤝
Guess the page is back again, congrats. :)
Staff member 10th Jan 2017 - 30th May 2020.
HF Administrator 30th May 2020 - 14th July 2022.
It was a blast being on staff. I stepped down as it's time for me to move on. I wish you all the best and if you were hit by my warnings and/or bans, it was nothing personal.
Peace out!
|
![[Image: hW3Ktfp.png]](https://i.imgur.com/hW3Ktfp.png)
