[stefsot]

For no valid reason.
I am not understanding why you're protecting him, because
it's inevitable he is in the wrong. I understand that he is the product
seller, and is obligated to sell anyone a product, but he shouldn't
add an auto-buy system if he expects people to get approved prior to purchasing.

Regardless, he isn't a trustworthy individual, and he blatantly lied to me.
This guy is a thief, and he has no credibility, other than his REP.

Then you should start reading what you are purchasing.

[img]http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/2163/datatos.png[/img]

After purchasing please PM me the serial you will receive trough email, otherwise your copy will get banned.

[Krew]

I want to see proof that you're actually Sarah Brooks, and you're not using a comprimised account.
Better yet, using your mother's PayPal account.

It is called a 'ewhore' PayPal account. Not a bad thing.

[n0$f3ratu$]

For no valid reason.
I am not understanding why you're protecting him, because
it's inevitable he is in the wrong. I understand that he is the product
seller, and is obligated to sell anyone a product, but he shouldn't
add an auto-buy system if he expects people to get approved prior to purchasing.

Regardless, he isn't a trustworthy individual, and he blatantly lied to me.
This guy is a thief, and he has no credibility, other than his REP.

stefsoft is "protecting" me because i hired him. 🤣🤣🤣
I also contacted others trough Skype, MSN, AOL, Jabber, facebook, ect to come and defend me and make a fool out of your self.
Oh wait i don't need others to do that. You are doing fine by your self.
And yes if you really want to know i want to purchase HF from Omni from your fees. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Learn what sarcasm is pretty boy.

[Depravity]

I want to see proof that you're actually Sarah Brooks, and you're not using a comprimised account.
Better yet, using your mother's PayPal account.

First and foremost, who are you? Does your opinion even matter?

Anyways, for those skeptics:
(Pretty sure it was SOLELY USED FOR E-WHORING.)

I am pretty sure all of the following information below somehow CORRELATE. If not, then I must be extremely stupid, and you're correct.

- Joined Craigslist on the same day as my PayPal's registration date.
- Created a Craigslist advertisement on the same day.

---

Then you should start reading what you are purchasing.

I proofread his topic, and I did not qualify in any of those criteria.

- I am the PayPal account holder.
- I do not have a negative balance of reputation ratings.
- No scam reports involving me.
- Did not encrypt files for others (had the license for an hour or less) / scanning on forbidden websites.

[trenth]

I think it was used because you have homosexual closet-tendencies.
Also, not having a legit PayPal account. Doesn't matter if you're "E-Whoring" or not. It's the same as if I was impersonating Barack Obama with a PayPal. This guy has every right to keep 3$ from you. I don't even know him, but after reading everything you said. You're bitching about 3$, or trying to "prove him as a scammer". If anyone is in the wrong here, it is you. Can you not see that clearly in black and white?

Goodluck Sarah, maybe if you charged higher prices for taking it in the ass you wouldn't complain about 3$

[n0$f3ratu$]

- Did not encrypt files for others (had the license for an hour or less) / scanning on forbidden websites.

Considering the amount of reds and neutrals you have i wouldn't expect any less.

[blazer4213]

First and foremost, who are you? Does your opinion even matter?

Anyways, for those skeptics:
(Pretty sure it was SOLELY USED FOR E-WHORING.)

I am pretty sure all of the following information below somehow CORRELATE. If not, then I must be extremely stupid, and you're correct.

- Joined Craigslist on the same day as my PayPal's registration date.
- Created a Craigslist advertisement on the same day.

---

I proofread his topic, and I did not qualify in any of those criteria.

- I am the PayPal account holder.
- I do not have a negative balance of reputation ratings.
- No scam reports involving me.
- Did not encrypt files for others (had the license for an hour or less) / scanning on forbidden websites.

I find it funny how he banned you for a reason/rule that wasn't even posted on his DATA PROTECTOR T.O.S.

He banned you for multi-accounting yet in his thread it doesn't state that he doesn't allow multi-accounters.

[Depravity]

Considering the amount of reds and neutrals you have i wouldn't expect any less.

Let me guess.
You're simpleminded, and you're susceptible to being deceived, so you judge another individual's credentials based upon their Reputation ratings?

Please, if you had a brain, go search a valid scam report against me on HackForums, which you so claimed that I was a potential fraud.

Then again, you're the one who has an open scam report, which you inevitably stole $3.00 USD from me, without my consent.

Pathetic scum.

---

I find it funny how he banned you for a reason/rule that wasn't even posted on his DATA PROTECTOR T.O.S.

He banned you for multi-accounting yet in his thread it doesn't state that he doesn't allow multi-accounters.

That so-called "multiple account" that he claimed was mine, isn't mine, and I have more evidence based on his judgement, just because the usernames were the same.

Also, the clueless, so-called "businessman," (inevitably brain-dead, and doesn't even code), claims that "pseudonymous" is an uncommon word, so theoretically, the account would be mine, since the users are similar.

Then again, "pseudonymous," is a legitimate word, and he is incorrect, stubborn, and too cheap to fully refund me, or allow me to continue using his services, rather than blatantly lying to me, then scamming me.

I already stated that I do not care for the amount.

But what happens if he scammed me out of a few hundred dollars?
The outcome would be different, based upon a number?

Ridiculous. If he had the motive to partially refund me, then what makes you think he wouldn't do the same to someone else, just so he can profit?

[stefsot]

Let me guess.
You're simpleminded, and you're susceptible to being deceived, so you judge another individual's credentials based upon their Reputation ratings?

Please, if you had a brain, go search a valid scam report against me on HackForums, which you so claimed that I was a potential fraud.

Then again, you're the one who has an open scam report, which you inevitably stole $3.00 USD from me, without my consent.

Pathetic scum.

---

That so-called "multiple account" that he claimed was mine, isn't mine, and I have more evidence based on his judgement, just because the usernames were the same.

Also, the clueless, so-called "businessman," (inevitably brain-dead, and doesn't even code), claims that "pseudonymous" is an uncommon word, so theoretically, the account would be mine, since the users are similar.

Then again, "pseudonymous," is a legitimate word, and he is incorrect, stubborn, and too cheap to fully refund me, or allow me to continue using his services, rather than blatantly lying to me, then scamming me.

I already stated that I do not care for the amount.

But what happens if he scammed me out of a few hundred dollars?
The outcome would be different, based upon a number?

Ridiculous. If he had the motive to partially refund me, then what makes you think he wouldn't do the same to someone else, just so he can profit?

Oh please... n0$f3ratu$ posted a screenshot of you saying that you lost the pass for that account and shit.... come on dude, have some self respect.

[Null State]

Oh please... n0$f3ratu$ posted a screenshot of you saying that you lost the pass for that account and shit.... come on dude, have some self respect.

Um, I'm pretty sure he's referring to the HF account that has L33T membership, and not the one Depravity said he created.

[Depravity]

Oh please... n0$f3ratu$ posted a screenshot of you saying that you lost the pass for that account and shit.... come on dude, have some self respect.

He is referring to the .NET Seal account, which I implied that I lost the password to my first .NET Seal account, which would be, "Depravity".

I am not lying, and there is no reason for me to lie.

(EDIT: Let me clarify this. When my HackForums' account, "Depravity," was banned for consistent harassment, and/or trolling after multiple warnings, I created another account for temporarily access.
I was simply attempting to contact the staff members to reconcile my past, since the ban length lasted between 2-weeks to 1-month. My memory is somewhat blurred, because this happened a long time ago.
I can assure you, the second HackForums' account I created were only accessed twice, or three times, and the total amount would have added up to a few minutes of activity. The culprit, (fraud's name here),
claims that I am another low-quality user, who he has dealt with in the past. Although, I am attempting to clear up my username, because we're not affiliated, nor do I even know the user.)

[Feather‍]

Considering the amount of reds and neutrals you have i wouldn't expect any less.

How does that matter? As long as he don't break your ToS you can't just assume he will and close his account.

I am not really sure what the problem is here, you have a product and a tos and he bought it. After PMing you, you didn't want to go through so just refund him?
Edit: Not taking anyones side here.

[n0$f3ratu$]

How does that matter? As long as he don't break your ToS you can't just assume he will and close his account.

I am not really sure what the problem is here, you have a product and a tos and he bought it. After PMing you, you didn't want to go through so just refund him?

Yes.
When i first saw his pm with the serial i asked from him to reply to his paypal email for verification, but after looking at all his reds and neutrals i decided to cancel it.
I refunded him partially deducting from the amount the fees i pay to net seal 0.25$ + 2.5% of the total sale which means $1 in his case.
The other 2$ are for using my software without waiting for my permission.
He also failed to follow my rules prior purchasing...

[GOOGLE-SEO]

I no nos for some time longer than most on here , and we in the past have had our issues , but i can say one thing nos is fair guy , he sees it how he sees it, if he has a reason to banned someone he has a good reason , i dont think any member here would not disagree with me on this..

Nos you are more of a man , let this fukwit carry on with shit. walk away as he aint worth even replying back to.

[Depravity]

Yes.
When i first saw his pm with the serial i asked from him to reply to his paypal email for verification, but after looking at all his reds and neutrals i decided to cancel it.
I refunded him partially deducting from the amount the fees i pay to net seal 0.25$ + 2.5% of the total sale which means $1 in his case.
The other 2$ are for using my software without waiting for my permission.
He also failed to follow my rules prior purchasing...

Which rule did I fail?
If nobody had a single negative reputation rating, then why did you sell it to them?

Do I have a negative amount of reputation ratings, yes or no?
If yes, then how am I still eligible to post in the Marketplace section, when you're required to have at least 1 positive reputation rating to post.

The other 2$ are for using my software without waiting for my permission."

I accessed your product twice (approximately 6-minutes of run time). I encrypted a file once, which I did not use, and it was a mere test.

I also sent you a private message prior to accessing the product.
Which you denied, stated that I was low-quality as fuck, and left an insignificant, deceiving -3 REP. rating on my profile.

Please explain, genius.



Also, you never requested for anything, and you simply stated, "never mind."