Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

Scammer Revenge Reps | Calls me a scammer with no proof

So this guy by the name of 'elvy666' decided to scam some guy for $33 BTC. Proper asshole.
I gave him a -3, with this as the description:

Autocorrect (162) Negative (-3) https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=4372600

This morning, I wake up to this bullshit:

elvy666 (210) Negative (-3): El kree dalumka skaemer! $25 nor julez payp



He called me a scammer with no proof. I don't care about the rep but I do care about the scammer part.
Is that against the rules? Where can I go from here? Thanks. 😊
(May 11, 2015 09:15 PM)Tonight Wrote:  If I get banned for harassment you guys better fix Orchid's diet before you help him fix his computer
If he is calling you a scammer with no scam report then that is rep abuse. If you feel like it violates HF rules, report it to omni.

What is reputation abuse?
Reputation abuse can be very complicated subject matter. Here is a list of the following ways reputation can be viewed as abuse.
• Flaming: Using coarse language to describe or berate a member.
• Reputation as a currency: We do not allowed the buying or selling of reputations.
• Gang Rep: The act of coordination with other members to raise or lower a member’s reputation is not allowed.
• Rep Coercion: Using intimidation, threats, or blackmail to get reps added or removed.
• Rep Requesting: You cannot give hints, tips, or request reputations.
• Scammer Reputation: You're required to leave a link to a Deal Dispute thread you have created to infer someone is a scammer (ie: scammer, scams, chargebacks, scamming).
• Reputation Collusion: Agreeing to participate in reciprocal reputations with a member.
Autocorrect, you called him a scammer without linking your own deal dispute thread that you have made. Your reputation is invalid too.
(Aug 2, 2014 05:30 PM)Gustav. Wrote:  Autocorrect, you called him a scammer without you linking to your own deal dispute thread that you have made. Your reputation is invalid too.

So everyone who leaves negative reputation on a scammers profile with a link; that's invalid?
Sorry I'm just really confused here.
(May 11, 2015 09:15 PM)Tonight Wrote:  If I get banned for harassment you guys better fix Orchid's diet before you help him fix his computer
(Aug 2, 2014 05:31 PM)Autocorrect Wrote:  So everyone who leaves negative reputation on a scammers profile with a link; that's invalid?
Sorry I'm just really confused here.

If you leave him rep calling him a scammer you are required to leave the dispute thread in the rep also. Same goes for him.
(Aug 2, 2014 05:31 PM)Autocorrect Wrote:  So everyone who leaves negative reputation on a scammers profile with a link; that's invalid?
Sorry I'm just really confused here.

Excuse me, I edited my post.

You have to link your own deal dispute thread for it to be valid, not others.

Quote:• Scammer Reputation: You're required to leave a link to a Deal Dispute thread you have created to infer someone is a scammer (ie: scammer, scams, chargebacks, scamming).
You did leave a link, so it's Valid.

He didn't leave a link so it isn't valid. I'd report him for rep abuse.
(Aug 2, 2014 05:33 PM)Gustav. Wrote:  Excuse me, I edited my post.

You have to link your own deal dispute thread for it to be valid, not others.

So I can't link a thread made by other users? Because I did link the scam report.
Would that mean that the other user who repped him is also technically breaking rules?

How have I not known this? Haha
(May 11, 2015 09:15 PM)Tonight Wrote:  If I get banned for harassment you guys better fix Orchid's diet before you help him fix his computer
(Aug 2, 2014 05:34 PM)Server97 Wrote:  You did leave a link, so it's Valid.

He didn't leave a link so it isn't valid. I'd report him for rep abuse.

Read the post above yours. Chief explained it.
(Aug 2, 2014 05:35 PM)Autocorrect Wrote:  So I can't link a thread made by other users? Because I did link the scam report.
Would that mean that the other user who repped him is also technically breaking rules?

How have I not known this? Haha
It has to be your own dispute thread. I saw many threads about people not linking their own dispute and have gotten repfucked because their rep was invalid. You might want to fix that before the same thing happens to you.
(Aug 2, 2014 05:36 PM)PHoeNuHX Wrote:  Read the post above yours. Chief explained it.

Jussayin, the post above mine actually agrees with me.
Alright, so both our reps are apparently invalid. If I edit mine, to just the link, that can not possibly be considered invalid right?
(May 11, 2015 09:15 PM)Tonight Wrote:  If I get banned for harassment you guys better fix Orchid's diet before you help him fix his computer
(Aug 2, 2014 05:38 PM)Autocorrect Wrote:  Jussayin, the post above mine actually agrees with me.
Alright, so both our reps are apparently invalid. If I edit mine, to just the link, that can not possibly be considered invalid right?

You have the right to link the dispute, but just don't call them a 'Scammer' without linking your own created deal dispute thread.
(Aug 2, 2014 05:37 PM)Gustav. Wrote:  It has to be your own dispute thread. I saw many threads about people not linking their own dispute and have gotten repfucked because their rep was invalid. You might want to fix that before the same thing happens to you.

Exactly, same thing happened to me. I got RF'd awhile ago with over 500+ Rep. So be careful and know the rules.
(Aug 2, 2014 05:39 PM)Gustav. Wrote:  You have the right to link the dispute, but just don't call them a 'Scammer' without linking your own created deal dispute thread.

Updated my rep following your advice. Does Omni take care of rep abuse? 😊
(May 11, 2015 09:15 PM)Tonight Wrote:  If I get banned for harassment you guys better fix Orchid's diet before you help him fix his computer
(Aug 2, 2014 05:42 PM)Autocorrect Wrote:  Updated my rep following your advice. Does Omni take care of rep abuse? 😊

He will but know that he will investigate your account to make sure you aren't breaking any rules as well.


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
[Policy Q] by NateJan 18, 2020 03:32 AM 6 321 Jan 18, 2020 03:32 AM
Last Post: Nate
[Feedback] by Leroy Jethro GibbsOct 11, 2019 11:22 AM 9 285 Oct 11, 2019 11:22 AM
Last Post: SoulZeh
[Policy Q] by Raymond "Red" ReddingtonSep 29, 2018 12:16 PM 13 461 Sep 29, 2018 12:16 PM
Last Post: Eagle 95