[The Pact]

Wow I think posting personal data should be considered more serious.

[Roger Waters]

Wow I think posting personal data should be considered more serious.

Depends on the situation and things such as that are done on a case-by-case basis.

[topdog77]

Seems fair enough, only point of contention I have is I once again got 30% warning for saying online @ rsgoldtime.com as always.

Skorp told me its due to "LQ post" but I cant see how its LQ when I say that on all my forums I bump on because it helps with SEO and stuff.


I don't really care but I got denied uber again over that which was disappointing :l.


I personally think what I did should of been allowed but that's just my opinon,clearly skorp thought otherwise :p.

[wander is a multi dwc]

Seems fair enough, only point of contention I have is I once again got 30% warning for saying online @ rsgoldtime.com as always.

Skorp told me its due to "LQ post" but I cant see how its LQ when I say that on all my forums I bump on because it helps with SEO and stuff.


I don't really care but I got denied uber again over that which was disappointing :l.


I personally think what I did should of been allowed but that's just my opinon,clearly skorp thought otherwise :p.

Did you just choose the wrong thread to post this?

[The Pact]

Depends on the situation and things such as that are done on a case-by-case basis.

That's good to hear.

---

Seems fair enough, only point of contention I have is I once again got 30% warning for saying online @ rsgoldtime.com as always.

Skorp told me its due to "LQ post" but I cant see how its LQ when I say that on all my forums I bump on because it helps with SEO and stuff.


I don't really care but I got denied uber again over that which was disappointing :l.


I personally think what I did should of been allowed but that's just my opinon,clearly skorp thought otherwise :p.

Almost all boards have rules against spamming for your sites or promotion. But I think you are allowed to advertise in your profile or sig? (as long as it's not a competing board)Not a 100% sure. But it's pretty standard message board fair that if you ALSO start spamming for anything in your actual posts you're going to get in trouble.

[Bromm]

Just posting on behalf of myself to inform all users that i'm aware of the forum rules xD

[SteppCarol]

Nice thread, good job man

[Captain Steve Rogers]

Banned: 100% warning will automatically ban you for two weeks.

Was searching for this, didn't even saw your thread haha blind me.

Thanks OP!

[ChickenTikka]

What about trolling?

My mate got banned for a week for trolling?

He doesn't recall any trolling also.

[Mr Kewl]

What about trolling?

My mate got banned for a week for trolling?

He doesn't recall any trolling also.

Posting Etiquette (+20 points) - 1 Month

^. Lucky just 1 week.

[dineshdina]

Now I understand the warnings .
Thanks for the post .

[SID GFX]

Thanks for this brief details about HF warning.

[Veracrypt]

I still don't all of this reputation thing . i dont see the purpose

[nuckle]

I'm glad you made this thread because I wasn't sure how the warnings worked and if they where permanent. When I made a thread asking everyone called me butthurt then negative my rep.
I was going to just stop hackforums all together because I felt my acount wasn't trust worthy anymore. Glad I understand now.

[NetworkSilence]

Quick question, if you get banned due to 100% warning, does it fully reset once your ban is lifted?

I would assume so obviously, and there is no way of getting perma banned if the only rules broken are petty af right?