[Grammar Rays]

Have you got other ideas to try and achieve the same/similar result or is this idea the only one so far?
I'm not too active in the Marketplace but if sub $1 sales are quite popular, this could kill off some legitimate activity.

[minimalist]

It appears that account sellers (rep buyers) are too intent on gaining in the real material items here (rep) and selling their non-free accounts to realize your intentions. I say that $1/account and banning all generators (which are really dumps of non-free accounts) would be ideal, but the latter is your call.

[♣βЯθCK345♣]

I don't wanna be that guy, but I was wondering about this as well. I'm all for people getting accounts, but some of these price drops were getting ridiculous. Also, one reason why I never really cared to sell Netflix is because the of market value for them. Also, I always thought they were primary doing for rep begs as well. A few years back when I sold Hulu's and Netflix, nobody had a problem buying accounts over 1$ now, that seems to be high for some people.

Edit: Lol generators have to be the biggest scam on the NFA section, but I'll leave that alone.

[ΑXiS]

LOL. Yeah I'm stupid for taking the bait and replying, but whatever.
[img]http://image.prntscr.com/image/5ee2ba74dc3042698bc52ee611bdbb7f.png[/img]

[img]http://image.prntscr.com/image/6995bc3a63c84685afdc73232f3e626c.png[/img]

[img]http://image.prntscr.com/image/6f1f697030d94a039faf2df44bfb0a79.png[/img]

The policy has been that way for a while. That's why you now have these penny sales.

@ΑXiS...maybe just banning you would solve the problems. You seem bent on finding a way to circumvent the intent of the policy.

Why, because I'm just telling you the inevitable?

I don't see you saying anything to him:

Making the price for an account $1 will destroy the whole market. Why buy one account for $1 instead of blowing $9-15 on a generator that gets updated on the daily.

If I was looking for a way to "bend the rules" so to speak, I would have just made a generator AFTER you imposed the rule, no?

I don't see why you keep thinking I'm looking for a way to bend the rules. The user above literally said the same thing as me, so it's obvious what's going to be going through peoples' heads if the rules was implemented. I was just telling you beforehand, you could just make the rule more in depth NOW, as it would save you possibly adding additional rules on the sale of generators in the future.

Stop thinking I have something against you and this forum, you asked for feedback, I was simply trying to help you. I'm not looking to get banned, closed, or RK'd, I simply gave you feedback. By all means, impose the rule, I won't make a generator and I have no intention to anyway, but countless other members will.
It's not like I suggested a brand new, never seen before program (the generators), in order to break the rules, but they already exist.

---

Just don't allow it in general. People do it to gain rep they don't give a fuck about the petty $0.01-$1.00 they make off of them.

AXiS it was nice knowing you!

$1 would be quite profitable, IF the market isn't ruined.

[Vitani]

I'd say about 0,50$ to 1$ as a minimum for one account wouldn't destroy the market at all, and it would make it fair in my opinion.

Just look at the CE section as an example. CE vendors are charging ridiculous rates (like 10% or 15%), and still loads of people use their services.
Point being, if there would be a set minimum price on HF it wouldn't ruin the market at all, aslong as things don't get too expensive.

[EagleScream]

Very nice idea to boost the market.
50cent to 1 dolla would we really nice

[Jаson]

I strongly believe a dollar is fair enough.

[Happeh]

It appears that account sellers (rep buyers) are too intent on gaining in the real material items here (rep) and selling their non-free accounts to realize your intentions. I say that $1/account and banning all generators (which are really dumps of non-free accounts) would be ideal, but the latter is your call.

Probably the best opinion here.

[TheChiеf]

I would say $0.5 is a fairly good value as these are cracked accounts usually. For example, A user might rather pay $6 a month for netflix than $1 for a netflix account which stops working in a day or two. Anyways its entirely upto the user but I would say a dollar would be a bit high for the minimum.

[Bluffer]

It appears that account sellers (rep buyers) are too intent on gaining in the real material items here (rep) and selling their non-free accounts to realize your intentions. I say that $1/account and banning all generators (which are really dumps of non-free accounts) would be ideal, but the latter is your call.

That would be very stupid to ban the sales of generators.. that's not what the problem is here... not to mention that's the main sellers of stickies in the NFA section. I do agree that accounts should be sold for at least $1.00 each though.

[joepvand]

I dont think there should be a minimal, hackforums is great because you have relatively great amounts of freedom.

[nique ta mere]

Honestly, I don't think imposing a "minimum price" per account would make much of a difference. There are reasons behind my thinking, let me explain.

Firstly, account generators. Unless you impost a minimum price on these generators, it would void the whole rule. For example, you may impose a $1 minimum price per Netflix account, but if someone is selling a generator that consists of a list of 1000 accounts at $10, that still brings the accounts down to $0.10 per account.

Also, although the threads may specify "$1 per Netflix account", if the threads links to an offsite website, such as my personal website, for example, where I'd be selling accounts for $0.01 each in reality, would this still be abusing this rule?

To add to this, although the sale of bulk accounts is technically not allowed, people still do it, and I suppose if you do decide to impose a minimum price, such as $1, it will heavily deter people from buying in bulk.

Like with most rules, I guess there will be a lot of both pros and cons to think about before imposing it. I guess it's up to you to decide whether the benefits will outweigh the negatives, and if it will improve the site for the better.

I agree, it's just gonna get more people selling them also.

[Lust.]

RIP Axis, ya tried, ya failed.
$1 could be a good start, if you could enforce this shit, but most of these fucking free account threads are just for rep-whoring or whatever else. I mean I'm not against some charity, but it's all for the wrong reasons here.

[Who Soup]

Should mirror the currency give aways and make it no less than $5

[stackoverflowin]

I think people should be required to sell their products through a payment processor rather than through personal message at a rate of around $0.15-$0.20