[MrCreepy]

GPU mining will boom and now gpus r going to be invisible from market again

[SIM-2015410]

yeah lol cash only secured its place at #3 marketcap in its first month lol what a failure

Why tf would you neg someone just because you disagree with them. I was referring to the lack of replay protection and even basic ability to send transactions on the day of release, I couldn't care less about the market cap

[Orgy]

Why tf would you neg someone just because you disagree with them. I was referring to the lack of replay protection and even basic ability to send transactions on the day of release, I couldn't care less about the market cap

??? bitcoin cash had both of those, though??

i negged u cause youre saying stupid shit. idc about disagreements. get your head out of your ass.

[SIM-2015410]

??? bitcoin cash had both of those, though??

i negged u cause youre saying stupid shit. idc about disagreements. get your head out of your ass.

On the day of release, literally noone could send their cash to an exchange to sell it, nothing worked. They fixed it since then ofc, but not release day.

[Orgy]

On the day of release, literally noone could send their cash to an exchange to sell it, nothing worked.

That was well known ahead of time. Many exchanges copied your balance over anyway and let you trade if you already had BTC on the exchange, so your point is incredibly stupid. Hell, that's not even the fault of BCC itself; it was just exchanges being cautious because of the risk that a contentious hardfork creates. Everything else worked, so why are you saying "nothing worked"?

The fact that you would call the coin a failure just because no exchanges were accepting new BCC on the first day is incredibly asinine.

[Vana]

and even basic ability to send transactions on the day of release

The issue of the difficulty being too high for the initial hashrate was known ahead of time and is the reason EDAs were implemented.

[SIM-2015410]

That was well known ahead of time. Many exchanges copied your balance over anyway and let you trade if you already had BTC on the exchange, so your point is incredibly stupid. Hell, that's not even the fault of BCC itself; it was just exchanges being cautious because of the risk that a contentious hardfork creates. Everything else worked, so why are you saying "nothing worked"?

The fact that you would call the coin a failure just because no exchanges were accepting new BCC on the first day is incredibly asinine.

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/bitco...ing-2017-8

[Vana]

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/bitco...ing-2017-8

Can you explain whatever your argument is with your own words? That article makes several points and it's not clear which of those you're backing.

[SIM-2015410]

Can you explain whatever your argument is with your own words? That article makes several points and it's not clear which of those you're backing.

It's just an example of how messy the release was, that's the only point I'm trying to make. Idk what you guys think you're arguing against.

[Vana]

It's just an example of how messy the release was, that's the only point I'm trying to make. Idk what you guys think you're arguing against.

Exchanges not immediately implementing BCC support is "messy"?

[SIM-2015410]

Exchanges not immediately implementing BCC support is "messy"?

-_- I'm not talking about exchanges here?? Where did I say anything about exchanges supporting cash? Orgy was the only one who brought that up. I'm talking about sending in general

[Vana]

-_- I'm not talking about exchanges here?? Where did I say anything about exchanges supporting cash? Orgy was the only one who brought that up. I'm talking about sending in general

That was one of the main points the article you linked was making, which is why I asked you to explain your argument.

Block mining was slow for about the first day, after the first EDA kicked in everything was fine. It wasn't "messy", it was anticipated.

[SIM-2015410]

That was one of the main points the article you linked was making, which is why I asked you to explain your argument.

Block mining was slow for about the first day, after the first EDA kicked in everything was fine. It wasn't "messy", it was anticipated.

Ok I think the difference here is with perspective. You're looking at the markets. I'm thinking about the trustworthiness and quality of the 'developers' of cash and it's code, code which is hacked together with a much lower standard of QA, test and review compared to core. That's why they had technical issues, and that's why I'm calling it messy.

[Vana]

Ok I think the difference here is with perspective. You're looking at the markets. I'm thinking about the trustworthiness and quality of the 'developers' of cash and it's code, code which is hacked together with a much lower standard of QA, test and review compared to core. That's why they had technical issues, and that's why I'm calling it messy.

Elaborate on "technical issues".

[Orgy]

Ok I think the difference here is with perspective. You're looking at the markets. I'm thinking about the trustworthiness and quality of the 'developers' of cash and it's code, code which is hacked together with a much lower standard of QA, test and review compared to core. That's why they had technical issues, and that's why I'm calling it messy.

man the point you're trying to make sure seems to keep changing. this is the first time you've mentioned any of this.

can you point to any source that the code is "hacked together"? and what "technical issues" you're talking about?