[#1] PURE RAT v4 // BEST HVNC RAT ◆ 🛒 View HF's Premium Marketplace ◆ Private Crypter - Unique Private Stubs ◆ Spoof Call and Spoof SMS set any caller ◆
Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact
Hack Forums Tech Computing Linux › Which is the fastest package manager?

Thread Closed 

Which is the fastest package manager?
datguy.dev
datguy.dev Offline
[closed@HF:]
Posts:
4,608
Threads:
365
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
βytes:
β 0
Game XP:
1
Oct 12, 2016 08:17 PM
Greetings,
Does anyone know - has facts - to which is the current fastest package manager? I hope that is a valid question? It seems viable. I see some say Zypper and others say pacman. I've been looking for some reputable benchmarks and really haven't found too much.

Thanks,
CorrosiveBlueberry
CorrosiveBlueberry Offline
»Child Soldier«
***
HF Ub3r
Posts:
1,650
Threads:
225
Credibility:
200
Popularity:
151
βytes:
β 0
Game XP:
0
Oct 13, 2016 02:27 PM
Definately Pacman and AUR. AUR is on arch and quicker but just a method for building pkgs so cant really call it that. always get on the newest kernel so quick its so nice so many updates. never tried zypper but most shit managers are slow cause "SECURITY/ENTERPRISE" fuck that i like bleeding buttholeedge
myanimelist: https://myanimelist.net/profile/fatedblizzard

always down to discuss anime or tech.


[Image: 8bfc16c1b89ef01590c6d5af9d70ec7c.jpg]
datguy.dev
datguy.dev Offline
[closed@HF:]
Posts:
4,608
Threads:
365
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
βytes:
β 0
Game XP:
1
Oct 13, 2016 03:01 PM
I'm really looking for a spreadsheet or chart that says the time it takes for each package manager to update, reinstall, install, uninstall, upgrade, etc. I haven't seen any comparisons with all of these aspects. Maybe I'll have to do it myself.
somejohndue
somejohndue Offline
[n00b@HF:]
*
Registered
Posts:
74
Threads:
0
Credibility:
000
Popularity:
0
βytes:
β 0
Game XP:
0
Oct 13, 2016 03:02 PM
The bottlenecks are less likely to be your package manager as much as it would be the repositories themselves. They're usually designed optimally, they're all working the same etc. No package manager actually employs delta updates or any other game changing difference that marks a speed increase.
datguy.dev
datguy.dev Offline
[closed@HF:]
Posts:
4,608
Threads:
365
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
βytes:
β 0
Game XP:
1
Oct 13, 2016 04:12 PM
(Oct 13, 2016 03:02 PM)somejohndue Wrote:  The bottlenecks are less likely to be your package manager as much as it would be the repositories themselves. They're usually designed optimally, they're all working the same etc. No package manager actually employs delta updates or any other game changing difference that marks a speed increase.

On that repo note, nothing would be perfect. But say updating it once a day, for a month, and then averaging the results wouldn't be useless results right.
SuckySucky
SuckySucky Away
[user@HF:]
*
Registered
Posts:
427
Threads:
2
Credibility:
000
Popularity:
10
βytes:
β 2
Game XP:
27
Oct 13, 2016 06:44 PM
You know. Package Managers aren't complicated. Should be pretty simple Bash Scripts that you would need.

Anything that takes long in a package manager is simply downloading from the repository. Thus; Your data is more towards how fast the repo is.
datguy.dev
datguy.dev Offline
[closed@HF:]
Posts:
4,608
Threads:
365
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
βytes:
β 0
Game XP:
1
Oct 13, 2016 09:02 PM
(Oct 13, 2016 06:44 PM)SuckySucky Wrote:  You know. Package Managers aren't complicated. Should be pretty simple Bash Scripts that you would need.

Anything that takes long in a package manager is simply downloading from the repository. Thus; Your data is more towards how fast the repo is.

This isn't like "for me." I'm not going to just use an OS because it is quicker. I'm just curious to which complete certain operations the fastest.


It appears that repositories could be a category all their own. You can download the source code and binaries beforehand.
ayleid96
ayleid96 Offline
[user@HF:]
*
Registered
Posts:
442
Threads:
77
Credibility:
000
Popularity:
3
βytes:
β 0
Game XP:
0
Oct 14, 2016 04:22 PM
(Oct 12, 2016 08:17 PM)datguy.dev Wrote:  Greetings,
Does anyone know - has facts - to which is the current fastest package manager? I hope that is a valid question? It seems viable. I see some say Zypper and others say pacman. I've been looking for some reputable benchmarks and really haven't found too much.

Thanks,

fastest, is FreeBSD's pkg... simiral to archs pacman, but this one is faster...
datguy.dev
datguy.dev Offline
[closed@HF:]
Posts:
4,608
Threads:
365
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
βytes:
β 0
Game XP:
1
Oct 14, 2016 06:20 PM
(Oct 14, 2016 04:22 PM)ayleid96 Wrote:  fastest, is FreeBSD's pkg... simiral to archs pacman, but this one is faster...

Do you have anything to support that claim?
ayleid96
ayleid96 Offline
[user@HF:]
*
Registered
Posts:
442
Threads:
77
Credibility:
000
Popularity:
3
βytes:
β 0
Game XP:
0
Oct 15, 2016 04:09 AM
(Oct 14, 2016 06:20 PM)datguy.dev Wrote:  Do you have anything to support that claim?

yes, i used FreeBSD and i know how pkg behaves
Betty Blue
Betty Blue Offline
SNAKE DOC
***
HF l33t
Posts:
3,626
Threads:
24
Credibility:
000
Popularity:
158
βytes:
β 46.81
Game XP:
1
Oct 15, 2016 04:41 AM
(Oct 14, 2016 06:20 PM)datguy.dev Wrote:  Do you have anything to support that claim?
I support it, and came here to post it. pkg is much, much faster. However, if you're using FreeBSD, ports is really the way to go.
XMPP: pm me
datguy.dev
datguy.dev Offline
[closed@HF:]
Posts:
4,608
Threads:
365
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
βytes:
β 0
Game XP:
1
Oct 15, 2016 06:29 AM (This post was last modified: Oct 15, 2016 06:31 AM by datguy.dev.)
I'm writing a research paper for a Linux course I'm taking. I wish I had chosen an easier topic. 🤦‍♂ I can't really use hearsay, but thanks for pointing me in a direction.
ayleid96
ayleid96 Offline
[user@HF:]
*
Registered
Posts:
442
Threads:
77
Credibility:
000
Popularity:
3
βytes:
β 0
Game XP:
0
Oct 16, 2016 01:07 PM
(Oct 15, 2016 06:29 AM)datguy.dev Wrote:  I'm writing a research paper for a Linux course I'm taking. I wish I had chosen an easier topic. 🤦‍♂ I can't really use hearsay, but thanks for pointing me in a direction.

FreeBSD is not linux, so probably you go for arch.. its not that hard xD
HostageDown
HostageDown Offline
[n00b@HF:]
*
Registered
Posts:
66
Threads:
0
Credibility:
000
Popularity:
0
βytes:
β 0
Game XP:
0
Oct 16, 2016 03:17 PM (This post was last modified: Oct 16, 2016 03:17 PM by HostageDown.)
(Oct 15, 2016 04:09 AM)ayleid96 Wrote:  yes, i used FreeBSD and i know how pkg behaves

LOL

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I would think your internet speed would decide how fast your package manager can download and install a package.

Doing updates every day for a month and comparing the days isn't going to show you anything, if one day there are 2 updates and another day there are 35 updates.

you would need to download the packages, then benchmark the install to get the info you are looking for... I think...
Next Oldest | Next Newest
Thread Closed 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
by Pata ManAug 5, 2013 07:41 PM 1 170 Aug 5, 2013 07:41 PM
Last Post: Priizim
by shixhaxermod98Mar 14, 2012 07:19 PM 3 136 Mar 14, 2012 07:19 PM
Last Post: Amzo
by ConchJun 11, 2011 08:56 PM 4 61 Jun 11, 2011 08:56 PM
Last Post: Gent