Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

DWC vs Do Not Deal reps

Now I know that DWC reps are allowed because everyone should always deal with caution with everyone, but are "Do not deal with user" reps pushing it too far towards invalid scammer rep? I know it's not directly saying that they're a scammer but it seems wrong.
[Image: serversig.gif]
Saying do not deal is meant as a suggestion, saying scammer is meant as a fact.

//thread
If people want they can message the user that left it and ask them why they left the rep. 'Do not deal' could refer to ignorance as opposed to obvious scammer.
If you have issues on/off HF PM me. I'm happy to talk.
Nope, it's same as dwc. You're stating your opinion about the user and giving suggestion to other users, they aren't obligated to follow. Hell you aren't obligated to follow when Omni puts DO NOT DEAL rep on account, there are still some idiots who deal with the account after that rep is put so... you get my point.
Staff member 10th Jan 2017 - 30th May 2020.
HF Administrator 30th May 2020 - 14th July 2022.

It was a blast being on staff. I stepped down as it's time for me to move on. I wish you all the best and if you were hit by my warnings and/or bans, it was nothing personal.

Peace out!


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
[Policy Q] by NateJan 18, 2020 03:32 AM 6 331 Jan 18, 2020 03:32 AM
Last Post: Nate
[Feedback] by Leroy Jethro GibbsOct 11, 2019 11:22 AM 9 300 Oct 11, 2019 11:22 AM
Last Post: SoulZeh
[Feedback] by WindsJun 4, 2019 10:45 PM 8 313 Jun 4, 2019 10:45 PM
Last Post: Omniscient