Hey, So I know about hashes and salts, but Im really no expert in it, and I've never come across this format of salt before, Could anyone help me identify it so I can crack it?
Hash:1643be51468c872be2d127500c5d01
Salt:46NOVWBFVK1ZQ749U4A0A7NDVCQTPR
Any help is appreciated
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Feb 4, 2021 06:43 PM)Wolf. Wrote: Hey, So I know about hashes and salts, but Im really no expert in it, and I've never come across this format of salt before, Could anyone help me identify it so I can crack it?
Hash:1643be51468c872be2d127500c5d01
Salt:46NOVWBFVK1ZQ749U4A0A7NDVCQTPR
Any help is appreciated
Looks like a BTC address without salt, no idea otherwise :'(
(Feb 5, 2021 11:18 AM)Yoda_warrior Wrote: Looks like a BTC address without salt, no idea otherwise :'(
A part of me thinks that the salt itself is hashed, But i'm not sure if that's possible, but it defo can't be a BTC addy, It's a weird one for sure
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Feb 5, 2021 11:26 AM)Wolf. Wrote: A part of me thinks that the salt itself is hashed, But i'm not sure if that's possible, but it defo can't be a BTC addy, It's a weird one for sure
Prob a custom hashing method :/ Just checked the salt, it ain't known
(Feb 5, 2021 11:35 AM)Yoda_warrior Wrote: Prob a custom hashing method :/ Just checked the salt, it ain't known
Appreciate the help, I'm gonna dig a bit more to see if I can find any reference to the way its being hashed!
DO NOT DEAL WITH THIS MEMBER
(Feb 5, 2021 11:58 AM)Wolf. Wrote: Appreciate the help, I'm gonna dig a bit more to see if I can find any reference to the way its being hashed!
Np! Tell me when you find it, i'm interested :D
$ hashid 1643be51468c872be2d127500c5d01
Analyzing '1643be51468c872be2d127500c5d01'
[+] Juniper Netscreen/SSG(ScreenOS)
(Feb 5, 2021 12:43 PM)Pernat1y Wrote: $ hashid 1643be51468c872be2d127500c5d01
Analyzing '1643be51468c872be2d127500c5d01'
[+] Juniper Netscreen/SSG(ScreenOS)
Oh, very interesting, I've never even heard about that hashing algorithm before ! Ill check it out, thanks for the help! Mind if I asked what tool you used to identify this?
(Feb 5, 2021 01:25 PM)Wolf. Wrote: Oh, very interesting, I've never even heard about that hashing algorithm before ! Ill check it out, thanks for the help! Mind if I asked what tool you used to identify this?
https://pypi.org/project/hashID/
Feb 5, 2021 01:55 PM
(This post was last modified: Feb 5, 2021 01:57 PM by SIM-3187190.)
(Feb 5, 2021 01:25 PM)Wolf. Wrote: Oh, very interesting, I've never even heard about that hashing algorithm before ! Ill check it out, thanks for the help! Mind if I asked what tool you used to identify this?
My first thoughts were Juniper or a Cisco type 7 hash, but i think they've already been mentioned. This one is rather puzzling, I had my cracking rig setup earlier and was going to get cracking a few hashes.
Going to keep up to date with this thread as I'm curious.
EDIT: only the Juniper one was mentioned - I'm starting to think this is a custom hashing algorithm if the hash isn't related to any Cisco/Juniper gear
Feb 5, 2021 10:29 PM
(This post was last modified: Feb 5, 2021 10:33 PM by satimon.)
(Feb 5, 2021 11:18 AM)Yoda_warrior Wrote: Looks like a BTC address without salt, no idea otherwise :'(
This is a truncated hash (should be 32 characters long) with salt.
Stop writing about hashes that you don't know anything about and learn more !
(Feb 5, 2021 12:43 PM)Pernat1y Wrote: $ hashid 1643be51468c872be2d127500c5d01
Analyzing '1643be51468c872be2d127500c5d01'
[+] Juniper Netscreen/SSG(ScreenOS)
This is an example hash Juniper Netscreen/SSG(ScreenOS) which requires a username, not salt
nNxKL2rOEkbBc9BFLsVGG6OtOUO/8n:user
Stop writing about hashes that you don't know anything about and learn more !
Feb 6, 2021 01:42 AM
(This post was last modified: Feb 6, 2021 01:44 AM by SIM-3187190.)
(Feb 5, 2021 10:29 PM)satimon Wrote: This is a truncated hash (should be 32 characters long) with salt.
Stop writing about hashes that you don't know anything about and learn more !
This is an example hash Juniper Netscreen/SSG(ScreenOS) which requires a username, not salt
nNxKL2rOEkbBc9BFLsVGG6OtOUO/8n:user
Stop writing about hashes that you don't know anything about and learn more !
How are you going to come in here so confidently and attempt to rip apart other users for "not knowing anything"? I guarantee they know more than you buddy, have some respect.
Looking at your post history, I can tell you really like to start fights and think you know everything huh
Feb 6, 2021 02:06 AM
(This post was last modified: Feb 6, 2021 02:16 AM by satimon.)
(Feb 6, 2021 01:42 AM)SIM-3187190 Wrote: How are you going to come in here so confidently and attempt to rip apart other users for "not knowing anything"? I guarantee they know more than you buddy, have some respect.
Looking at your post history, I can tell you really like to start fights and think you know everything huh
I don't know everything but I only publish content-related posts, not junk posts.
You didn't even know what a juniper hash looks like until I showed it, so don't post junk posts because it's a shame
(Feb 5, 2021 01:55 PM)SIM-3187190 Wrote: My first thoughts were Juniper or a Cisco type 7 hash, but i think they've already been mentioned. This one is rather puzzling, I had my cracking rig setup earlier and was going to get cracking a few hashes.
Going to keep up to date with this thread as I'm curious.
EDIT: only the Juniper one was mentioned - I'm starting to think this is a custom hashing algorithm if the hash isn't related to any Cisco/Juniper gear
There is no such Cisco type 7 hash and other Cisco hashes are not even similar to the hash from the first post
Stop writing about hashes that you don't know anything about and learn more !
This is a truncated hash (should be 32 characters long) with salt.
Feb 6, 2021 02:37 AM
(This post was last modified: Feb 6, 2021 02:37 AM by SIM-3187190.)
(Feb 6, 2021 02:06 AM)satimon Wrote: I don't know everything but I only publish content-related posts, not junk posts.
You didn't even know what a juniper hash looks like until I showed it, so don't post junk posts because it's a shame
There is no such Cisco type 7 hash and other Cisco hashes are not even similar to the hash from the first post
Stop writing about hashes that you don't know anything about and learn more !
This is a truncated hash (should be 32 characters long) with salt.
Dude, I literally mentioned Juniper before you? And a 2 second search https://duckduckgo.com/?q=cisco+type+7+hash shows that it is a thing.
(Feb 6, 2021 02:37 AM)SIM-3187190 Wrote: Dude, I literally mentioned Juniper before you? And a 2 second search https://duckduckgo.com/?q=cisco+type+7+hash shows that it is a thing.
Read with understanding:
"A type 7 password is not actually encrypted at all it is simply encoded."
Cisco hashes don't have salt, don't have username (except Cisco-ASA MD5) and look different than hash from first post.
I repeat no Hashes Cisco type 7, proof example hashes link:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=example_hashes
Stop writing about hashes that you don't know anything about and learn more !
|