Honestly, a lot of ebooks I've reviewed have similar methods that I've seen if I have knowledge in it.
If you have such a problem with the ebook section, don't go there.
It's like stating that "Omg, why all these kids post stupid GTs in GT section?" if you don't like it, get the hell out of the section.
I try to not take on reviews on topics I don't know, but sometimes that can't be avoided by Reviewers.
You are expecting a Reviewer that has extensive knowledge everywhere, has read hundreds of methods on making money, and is going to shell out money each and every time he Reviews it to test out if the logical ideal works? We aren't made of money, we don't get paid to review these ebooks, and we have standards in which we can review them.
Don't point a finger at Reviewers as a group, point it at some of the concepts laid down by the administration.
The members try as best as they can to give a good review, be unbiased, and tell if a method works.
It's funny though, when someone consistently gives awful reviews people are like, "That kid is a terrible Reviewer" even though they are just being honest.
Don't hate the players, hate the game. Hate the people that copy and make shitty ebooks or steal ideas.
Use common sense when it comes to ebooks. If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
"Make $15000 in a month!" Yeah... I'm sure. -_-
Use common sense instead of rallying what seems to be very negative threads against a group that tries hard to keep up with reviews.
Quote:Check out my thread I made about removing the Reviewers team and adding a team to test the ebooks.
Where the hell does the money come from to test the ebooks? I'm not going to waste $100 a month "testing" each ebook.
I have college expenses I'd much rather spend my money on.
(Aug 26, 2011 08:02 AM)Ηεαυεη⇔Ηειι ♠™ Wrote: Why I ask of them, the leaders of the E-book reviewers Why are you people are biased in choosing recruits?
When are you guys ever gonna choose someone who is really talented over stuff's like these.
Why do you find it so cumbersome to recruit people who have knowledge?
Why are you guys so adamant in recruiting people who can only write in flamboyant English, when its clearly evident that they don't posses any knowledge whatsoever on it.
Why?
Biased in recruiting? For the most part, they pick quality applicants, there is only one member I could speak of that didn't have the quality because they didn't research his scam reports, and he was kicked within a day or two.
Just because they may pick prominent members that have made a name for themselves, doesn't mean it's biased.
It's a lot easier to go through someone with a decent amount of posts, look at their posting style, and see if the Reviewer application was a try hard attempt to getting in.
Quote:When are you guys ever gonna choose someone who is really talented over stuff's like these.
Talented? Writing and grammatical skills are some of the key points to being a reviewer.
By all means, if you feel you know everything there is to know about ebooks, post that, your arrogance will probably be your downfall for doing so.
Quote:Why do you find it so cumbersome to recruit people who have knowledge?
We get it, someone made a bad review because he didn't know much about the subject, we try to not let that happen.
It isn't possible for someone to be knowledgeable in every subject matter.
Quote:Why are you guys so adamant in recruiting people who can only write in flamboyant English, when its clearly evident that they don't posses any knowledge whatsoever on it.
I never wrote in flamboyant English in my Reviewers application, I just typed how I normally type.
Reviewers also have standards, you are supposed to be official and proper, often pertaining to unique posting be some individuals when making reviews.
