[CryptixHacking]

This is a simple project I created that allows you to hack and manipulate packets withing your own LAN network. By using this tool you can force any system on your network to be kicked offline or allow them back online. You can make any website they visit load another website. You can inject HTML code into any HTTP webpage they visit in browser or even log and capture the network data from any selected port you desire.


Virus Scan Results

Download Cryptix Network Owner


Command Line Version also available,


Download CryptixArp CommandLine

Command Line Based Tool - Is a revamped and modified version of zxarps "pZXARPS" - Credit to "LZX,SinCoder"
Publicly available open source


Should also be noted this application will not work without WinPcap Drivers installed so you may need to install WinPcap if you get issues

[Gary]

any network on your system


Do you mean any system on your network?

[Armada]

I stand corrected.

Sorry for the misunderstanding, that wrapper you used raised some real unusual flags.

Cleaned your thread up for ya. 🤝

[CryptixHacking]

Seems like you didn't make this

https://github.com/sincoder/zxarps/blob/master/main.cpp

You are correct I never made the zxarps tool I believe that was created by a asain or chinese guy going by the name of sincoder.


I did however use his source code supplied there and converted most of the gibberish back into english also cleaned up a few functions they had going within the code. And edited a few of the header library files within the source. So tech I converted the code into a more understandable english version and fixed a few small functions in the code. The GUI "wrapper" however itself is fully custom and coded in lua to interact with the modified version of that command line tool I converted and fixed up. So I will admit I somewhat script-kiddie'd the orginal zxarps source but really just as a way to understand how its functions worked and to make it easier to use.

Its a edited,modified and fixed up version of a open source release built upon and expended upon.

[Armada]

You are correct I never made the zxarps tool I believe that was created by a asain or chinese guy going by the name of sincoder.


I did however use his source code supplied there and converted most of the gibberish back into english also cleaned up a few functions they had going within the code. And edited a few of the header library files within the source. So tech I converted the code into a more understandable english version and fixed a few small functions in the code. The GUI "wrapper" however itself is fully custom and coded in lua to interact with the modified version of that command line tool I converted and fixed up. So I will admit I somewhat script-kiddie'd the orginal zxarps source but really just as a way to understand how its functions worked and to make it easier to use.

Its a edited,modified and fixed up version of a open source release built upon and expended upon.

Er, conversion of source code from an already readable, compiled version is well.. theft...

Being you purged the debate I had with you earlier, I will quote your OP instead:

This is a simple project I created

I am sorry, WHO created?

You literally just admitted you used someone elses source, but yet this is something you wrote?

I f*cking knew there was something up when I ran my scan this morning.... SMH...

[CryptixHacking]

Er, conversion of source code from an already readable, compiled version is well.. theft...

Being you purged the debate I had with you earlier, I will quote your OP instead:


I am sorry, WHO created?

You literally just admitted you used someone elses source, but yet this is something you wrote?

I f*cking knew there was something up when I ran my scan this morning.... SMH...

Listen the GUI "wrapper" 150% coded by me using the lua language via the AutoPlay media Studio.

The command line tool that the GUI uses to work and interact with - CryptixArp is based off the source of zxarps by sincoder yes but in no way shape or form is it the same code. His first off isnt even in english and many of the functions and loops within his source had issues. So I took and fixed and converted the command line tool source code myself and recompiled it to be english friendly and work better then compiled the "AMS" based GUI to work with it thats all.

Correct I Created this project.

You can check out the zxarps command line tool yourself and see its open source files will not match up to my command line tool I fixed revamped converted and rebuilt and expended upon his source then made a GUI for the tool after. Not sure how taking a "OPEN SOURCE" publicly available source code that half of which is not even in english and or its functions flawed and recompiling it counts as theft. Maybe at most a little script kiddiesh but theft really lol.

I would like if people would calm there tits down and think before spamming post on my thread that or inaccurate or irrelevant, I understand asking question but straight up making claims and false claims is nothing but annoying.

[Armada]

Listen the GUI "wrapper" 150% coded by me using the lua language via the AutoPlay media Studio.

The command line tool that the GUI uses to work and interact with - CryptixArp is based off the source of zxarps by sincoder yes but in no way shape or form is it the same code. His first off isnt even in english and many of the functions and loops within his source had issues. So I took and fixed and converted the command line tool source code myself and recompiled it to be english friendly and work better then compiled the "AMS" based GUI to work with it thats all.

Correct I Created this project.

You can check out the zxarps command line tool yourself and see its open source files will not match up to my command line tool I fixed revamped converted and rebuilt and expended upon his source then made a GUI for the tool after. Not sure how taking a "OPEN SOURCE" publicly available source code that half of which is not even in english and or its functions flawed and recompiling it counts as theft. Maybe at most a little script kiddiesh but theft really lol.

You tolk open source and wrapped it in a fancy wrapper.

Expect my +4 to turn to a -4 once my cool down ends for this gibberish.

I wasted time analyzing this only to be told I was wrong and only to be shown it was fucked up anyways, although in another method.

Some links to mull over while you consider grabbing another github project to push around here:
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5673178
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5657375

Result:




Dont do it man....

Belief it or not, I am trying to help here. lul

[CryptixHacking]

LOL

The source I based this projects command line tool on zxarps "CryptixArp" is not registered under any trademark stamp or copyright protected in any way or form. Now taking a copyright protected or trademark protected source and editing that and claiming it as your own is just dumb which is not what I did here.


I suggest you take a look at the xzarps project itself and compare it to mine. One thing you should notice is that mine runs better and is smaller and is faster and is easier to understand.

I took a "OPEN SOURCE" non copyright or trademark protected source code fixed and converted the source code to be more effective and easier to use, Recompiled it then coded a custom wrapper and GUI to interact with it.

[Armada]

LOL

The source I based this projects command line tool on zxarps "CryptixArp" is not registered under any trademark stamp or copyright protected in any way or form. Now taking a copyright protected or trademark protected source and editing that and claiming it as your own is just dumb which is not what I did here.


I suggest you take a look at the xzarps project itself and compare it to mine. One thing you should notice is that mine runs better and is smaller and is faster and is easier to understand.

I took a "OPEN SOURCE" non copyright or trademark protected source code fixed and converted the source code to be more effective and easier to use, Recompiled it then coded a custom wrapper and GUI to interact with it.

You took code that was not yours and claimed as it as your own.

That is theft, dumb ass.

[CryptixHacking]

You took code that was not yours and claimed as it as your own.

That is theft, dumb ass.

Not true I took a publicly available source code that is not copyrighted or protected under any trademark laws. And edited the original source code and its header libraries to work better and be easier to read and understand. I then recompiled it and created a wrapper and GUI to interact with the new command line tool that has been revamped.

That is not theft you cant get my program CryptixARP or the GUI Network Owner from anywhere else online other than if someone else just uploads the same programs I created for the project.

You can get a zxarps project that is not copyright protected or trademark protected and compile or edit that code but it still will not be the same project or programs I have here.

[Armada]

Not true I took a publicly available source code that is not copyrighted or protected under any trademark laws. And edited the original source code and its header libraries to work better and be easier to read and understand. I then recompiled it and created a wrapper and GUI to interact with the new command line tool that has been revamped.

That is not theft you cant get my program CryptixARP or the GUI Network Owner from anywhere else online.

You can get a zxarps project that is not copyright protected or trademark protected and compile or edit that code but it still will not be the same project or programs I have here.

I dont see any credit to the original coder though... ? ❓
Have you respect?

[CryptixHacking]

I dont see any credit to the original coder though... ? ❓
Have you respect?

That is true I should of gave credit to the OG coder of the source I built upon that is true I give you that xD

But seeing as how the OG coder "sincoder" is like from korea or china and half his program wasnt even understandable in english and his code has been publicly avaliable for over 3 years and I had to fix some of his functions loops and header files I didnt care to give them credit.

Although I guess I should have , I guess yes it was a somewhat disrespectful move but at the same time his program is not the same as mine. But never the less you are correct I should have gave credit.

[Armada]

That is true I should of gave credit to the OG coder of the source I built upon that is true I give you that xD

But seeing as how the OG coder "sincoder" is like from korea or china and half his program wasnt even understandable in english and his code has been publicly avaliable for over 3 years and I had to fix some of his functions loops and header files I didnt care to give them credit.

Although I guess I should have , I guess yes it was a somewhat disrespectful move but at the same time his program is not the same as mine. But never the less you are correct I should have gave credit.

I mean thats what respectible coders do:
Spoiler (Click to View)

[CryptixHacking]

I mean thats what respectible coders do:

Well for what its worth I added credit to the OG coder in the main thread post.

But yes should be noted its based off a open source release that is not copyright protected or registered as a trademark. And even if they did copyright that code and project or trademark protect it. My project and programs cant be held liable to breaking such copyrights or trademark protections as I can prove I made the programs and project before the fact they were ever protected with such rights.

[Armada]

Well for what its worth I added credit to the OG coder in the main thread post.

But yes should be noted its based off a open source release that is not copyright protected or registered as a trademark. And even if they did copyright that code and project or trademark protect it. My project and programs cant be held liable to breaking such copyrights or trademark protections as I can prove I made the programs and project before the fact they were ever protected with such rights.

Again, I am trying to help you here.

Read this:
https://hackforums.net/showthread.php?tid=5673178

See what happened?

He got banned. Intellectual property, open source or not, is not allowed to be "Re-branded" as what you have done here.

Take the warning dude....