Home Upgrade Search Memberlist Extras Hacker Tools Award Goals Help Wiki Contact

NFA Feedback and Views

(May 28, 2016 01:35 PM)Bluffer Wrote:  That would be very stupid to ban the sales of generators.. that's not what the problem is here... not to mention that's the main sellers of stickies in the NFA section. I do agree that accounts should be sold for at least $1.00 each though.

After the setting of a minimum price per non-free account, the only purpose of a generator would be to circumvent the very rule that was made to prevent accounts being had for cheap.
I don't middleman any deals on- or off-site. Please don't message me requesting my past services and certainly don't fall for anybody who claims to be me.
(May 28, 2016 01:39 PM)minimalist Wrote:  After the setting of a minimum price per non-free account, the only purpose of a generator would be to circumvent the very rule that was made to prevent accounts being had for cheap.
So ban all generators??? No you would just put a minimum price on generators too.
Nowadays? I'm just here for the nostalgia.
(May 28, 2016 01:40 PM)Bluffer Wrote:  So ban all generators??? No you would just put a minimum price on generators too.

And what is a generator? A collection of non-free account dumps?

🤫
I don't middleman any deals on- or off-site. Please don't message me requesting my past services and certainly don't fall for anybody who claims to be me.
Realistically I don't think I have a choice when it comes to account generators. They have to be banned.

I'm going to set a $1 minimum price per account in NFA.

Adding policy data to the Help Docs and forum sections now.
(May 28, 2016 01:47 PM)Omniscient Wrote:  Realistically I don't think I have a choice when it comes to account generators. They have to be banned.

I'm going to set a $1 minimum price per account in NFA.

Adding policy data to the Help Docs and forum sections now.

That could kill this section though rendering it useless?
I only use https://ricochet.im - ricochet:lmi3tdtlsnziqwdk

Jabber: [email protected]
(May 28, 2016 01:49 PM)stackoverflowin Wrote:  That could kill this section though rendering it useless?

If it doesn't work as intended, the rule can be changed or removed.
The amount of fake reputation floating around isn't cool. 😎

Plus this kinda thing is closely related to phishing however I'm not sure if there are many if any at all contacts to HF from the likes of Netflix, Spotify, even the police regarding these accounts / phishing. Netflix and Spotify are cool, fraud, phishing, and the like, is not. 😎
If there was a limit it shouldn't be $1. Probably like .25 or .50. I don't think Spotify's and netflix are worth $1, especially since they've been saturated to death by the penny sellers. And generators.
(May 28, 2016 01:56 PM)♣βЯθCK345♣ Wrote:  If there was a limit it shouldn't be $1. Probably like .25 or .50. I don't think Spotify's and netflix are worth $1, especially since they've been saturated to death by the penny sellers. And generators.

Generators and penny sellers have both just been wiped out.
So saturation should decrease, which is a good thing right?
Lol, I didn't realize the minimal was imposed, I guess I need to change my spotify prices.

To the above: I don't think we needed a $1, but the market is already saturated. I was just saying, nobody is going to want to by $1 for a spotify or netflix because they've been sold for nearly free for so long.
(May 28, 2016 02:00 PM)♣βЯθCK345♣ Wrote:  Lol, I didn't realize the minimal was imposed, I guess I need to change my spotify prices.

To the above: I don't think we needed a $1, but the market is already saturated. I was just saying, nobody is going to want to by $1 for a spotify or netflix because they've been sold for nearly free for so long.

Adapt or perish I guess.
Nowadays? I'm just here for the nostalgia.
(May 28, 2016 02:00 PM)♣βЯθCK345♣ Wrote:  Lol, I didn't realize the minimal was imposed, I guess I need to change my spotify prices.

To the above: I don't think we needed a $1, but the market is already saturated. I was just saying, nobody is going to want to by $1 for a spotify or netflix because they've been sold for nearly free for so long.

people will if people actually honor the warranties they claim they will give on the accounts.
Will any rules on lifetime "warranties" (replacements) be imposed as well? No rule suggestions allowed, but I think this would help the market.

What I mean this is, will buyers be able to claim replacements on accounts sold for less than $1?
I don't middleman any deals on- or off-site. Please don't message me requesting my past services and certainly don't fall for anybody who claims to be me.
(May 28, 2016 02:10 PM)minimalist Wrote:  Will any rules on lifetime "warranties" (replacements) be imposed as well? No rule suggestions allowed, but I think this would help the market.

What I mean this is, will buyers be able to claim replacements on accounts sold for less than $1?
Accounts can't be sold for less than $1...
(May 28, 2016 02:10 PM)minimalist Wrote:  Will any rules on lifetime "warranties" (replacements) be imposed as well? No rule suggestions allowed, but I think this would help the market.

What I mean this is, will buyers be able to claim replacements on accounts sold for less than $1?

lol omni is not gonna force people to give warranties on accounts.
(May 28, 2016 02:13 PM)ΑXiS Wrote:  Accounts can't be sold for less than $1...

I think he mean existing/previous sales. Could be wrong though.


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
[News] by OmniscientSep 5, 2023 07:15 PM 10 460 Sep 5, 2023 07:15 PM
Last Post: Gary Clark Jr.
by drdeplorableJun 2, 2021 06:39 AM 5 328 Jun 2, 2021 06:39 AM
Last Post: False King
[Policy Q] by IconicalMar 5, 2021 12:31 AM 14 413 Mar 5, 2021 12:31 AM
Last Post: Grim